Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Frank Sterle Jr's avatar

Regardless of who runs and gets elected—especially when it's through the First Past The Post ballot system—we live in a virtual corpocracy that masquerades as a real democracy. While the FPTP may technically qualify as democratic within the democracy spectrum, it’s still particularly democratically weak.

But FPTP does seem to serve corporate lobbyists well. Perhaps it's why such powerful interests generally resist (albeit likely clandestinely) grassroots-supported attempts at changing from FPTP to more proportionally representative electoral systems of governance, the latter which dilutes corporate influence on government policy and decisions.

Low-representation FPTP-elected governments, in which a relatively small portion of the country's populace is actually electorally represented, are the easiest for lobbyists to manipulate or ‘buy’. It's largely an insidiously covert rule by way of potently manipulative and persuasive corporate and big-monied lobbyists.

Corporate lobbyists write bills for our governing representatives to vote for and have implemented, supposedly to save the elected officials their own time writing them. The practice may have become so systematic that those who are aware of it, including mainstream news-media political writers, don’t find reason to publicly discuss or write about it. ‘We are a capitalist nation, after all,’ the morally lame self-justification can go.

Perhaps ‘Calamity’ Jane Bodine, in the film Our Brand Is Crisis, is correct in stating: “If voting changed anything [in favor of the weak/poor/disenfranchised] they’d have made it illegal.”

Expand full comment

No posts